Finally, let`s look at the most frequent discussions as part of an agreement. Tables 10-14 show, according to the thematic convention, that each model is composed of at least two types of events. The types of events that make up a pattern are separated by a space. Each type of event starts with the name of a given class, followed by „b“ or „e“ for „begin“ or „end,“ followed by the item`s name in the specified class. As an example of this general scoring system, see the first model of Table 10: „default_disagree“ – an element of the match class, that is, a default disagreement event. Table 11 confirms what we have seen in the simplest two-event diagrams: head-shaking is both before and after the expression of disagreements. In addition, conthesatatives and backchannel are among the most common events involved in more complex patterns, including integration. Agreeing is not an individual`s autonomous state of mind: it is a behavioral event that necessarily involves an interaction that requires at least two actors and a subject. It appears as a reflection on the veracity of a statement, from a point of view or an opinion and can develop under at least two conditions: (a) during the interaction, the actors recognize that they share the same point of view independently of each other, or (b) one or more of the actors are convinced of the argument of the other actors. The unification process takes different forms, depending on these two different conditions: if actors A and B share the same point of view independently, actor B`s agreement usually follows a statement or elaboration by Actor A as backchannel of some type (as yes, indeed!). If Actor B is convinced by Actor A of the veracity of a given point of view, actor B`s act of consent may follow a question or request from Actor A (as.B. How do you feel about that? or do you vote?), but other scenarios (such as those involving non-verbal events or pauses, virtually anything that leads to a change of turn) are also possible.
As in the case of an agreement, a disagreement develops as an act of response to a previous call (Kakavé, 1993). Locher, 2004). Disagreement is often described as behaviour that reflects a kind of confrontation that, understood as a function of face and courtesy, should be avoided (cf. Sacks, 1973/1987); Brown and Levinson, 1978/1987; Leech, 1983; Pomerantz, 1984). Schiffrin (1984), however, shows that it can also signal conviviality, i.e. differences of opinion can even strengthen social relations. The role of context in interpreting these behaviours is widely recognized in pragmatism, even if the term itself is not sufficiently defined. Sifianou (2012) finds that for correct interpretation, longer periods of time to recognize the development of personal characteristics and relational hishesions must even be considered. In the making of language, whether speaking or writing, one of the most important linguistic functions is that of agreement and contradiction. This linguistic funciton is important because it allows locophones to negotiate meaning and make agreements while communicating with others.
That is why I will teach you in today`s quick letter how to express your agreement and disagreement in English with a comprehensive list of expressions that will allow you to agree with others and not approve of them. I will also show you a few words to express your opinion, because this is closely related to how we agree or disagree with others. Table 10 confirms our discrepancies: it is strongly linked to head jolts in a series of files (records). Its orientation in time towards disagreements is also evident: the beginning of the disagreement ends with the beginning of the shake-head, its end with the end of the shake-head. It is also interesting to note that the forward launch can be associated with both the beginning and the end of disagreements, the direction that suggests certain cognitive processes corresponding to the current state of disagreement.